Apple’s Safari: One Browser or Three?

Apple Contends that Safari Comprises Three Distinct Browsers in Order to Circumvent Regulation

Apple claims Safari is three separate browsers to avoid regulation.

Recently, Apple made an interesting claim that has raised a few eyebrows. The tech giant argues that Safari is not just one browser, but three! While this might sound like a clever trick to dodge some regulatory hurdles in the European Union, it certainly has technology fans scratching their heads.

According to Apple’s filing to the European Commission, Safari for iOS, iPadOS, and macOS are entirely different beasts, each serving unique purposes. They even went so far as to highlight Safari’s sidebar feature, available on iPadOS and macOS, which allows users to have quick access to opened tabs, tab groups, bookmarks, and browsing history. The absence of this feature in the iOS version, Apple argues, makes it a distinctly different browser. Their claim suggests that each version of Safari caters to the specific needs of users depending on the device they’re using.

But not so fast, Apple. The European Commission quickly pointed out that Safari’s functionality and underlying technologies are remarkably similar across platforms. They even cited Apple’s own marketing materials for their Continuity feature, which boldly proclaims, “Same Safari. Different device.” It’s hard to argue with that, isn’t it?

As a result, the Commission rejected Apple’s claim and made it clear that Safari is, indeed, a single web browser, regardless of the device it’s accessed from. Apple now finds itself in a sticky situation, obliged to ensure that Safari complies with the Digital Markets Act (DMA) requirements. This means allowing non-WebKit-based browsers on iOS and iPadOS.

Failure to adhere to the new regulations could lead to EU investigations and hefty fines. We’re talking fines that could reach up to a staggering 10 percent of a company’s global turnover! And if you think that’s bad, repeat violations could face a 20 percent penalty. It seems Apple has found itself caught in the crosshairs of EU scrutiny.

Now, the question remains: Does Apple’s argument of Safari being three distinct browsers violate the DMA’s Anti-Circumvention provision? This provision prohibits companies from splitting a platform’s market share to avoid regulation. It looks like Apple might have to tread carefully to stay on the right side of the law.

So, whether you’re a Safari lover or simply an intrigued technology enthusiast, keep an eye on this developing story. The battle between Apple and the European Union is heating up, and the fate of Safari hangs in the balance.

What do you think? Is Apple stretching the truth with its three-browser claim? Share your thoughts with us in the comments below!

Note: Due to the political nature of this topic, the discussion thread for this article can be found in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and join the conversation, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.